Sports

February 2005

SportMart.ca - Canada's biggest online sporting goods retailer!


home

feature

entertainment

sports

technology

write corner

submissions

advertise

about us

press releases

back issues

 

 

 Travelocity.ca - Make Reservations for Airlines, Cars, and Hotels

 

No hockey
by Cheryl Mah


No talks. No proposals. No hockey.

This will likely be the first time since 1919 that the oldest and most revered professional sports trophy – the Stanley Cup - will not be awarded.

What a shame.

In 1919, the final was cancelled due to an influenza epidemic. In 2005? A bitter labour dispute, where both the league and NHLPA have dug in their heels, threatens the entire season.

There have been no meaningful talks since Dec. 14 and even the most optimistic can see the end is near. The latest round of low level talks initiated by Trevor Linden only seem to confirm that fact.

The NHL could make history by becoming the first major North American pro sport to cancel an entire season because of a labour dispute.

The 2005 all-star game, which was set to be played February 13 in Atlanta, has already been cancelled. This is only the second time in its 57 year history the showcase game has been cancelled.

The league has not set an official deadline to cancel this season but the general consensus is that if a new collective bargaining agreement is not hammered out by January, there will not be enough time for any meaningful regular season games and playoffs.

It’s the league's first lockout since the 1994-95 season, which lasted 103 days before a 48-game schedule started in late January.

This time around, both sides have declared war. There have been no “negotiations” – simply my "way or no way."

Gary Bettman wants cost certainty. Bob Goodenow says the players won’t accept a salary cap.

The players last presented a proposal that offered an immediate 24 percent rollback on all existing contracts and lower the cap on entry-level contracts and bonuses, which was rejected by the owners. The players then rejected a counterproposal presented by the NHL, which again included a salary cap.

So the stalemate continues.

Both sides have a lot to lose. Older marquee players could be going into early retirement depending how long this lockout lasts while younger players are losing valuable experience.

In the States, where hockey is less popular than bowling, the damage could be long lasting. Not only will this lockout erode the already poor fan base, it will dry up much needed television, merchandising and advertising revenue.

The near-total apathy toward the work stoppage south of the border should be a major concern for the NHL, which is trying to fix the business of hockey.

It’s hard to pick sides in this increasingly ridiculous dispute where millionaire players and billionaire owners can’t decide how to manage a multi-million dollar business; where owners sign players to $10 million contracts and then say they are suffering financial problems; and where mediocre players do make too much money.

Meanwhile, people and businesses that make a living off the sport continue to be impacted and fans are turning elsewhere.

Without a doubt, the game does need to be improved. There are too many teams in areas with no fan base with a resulting dilution of the talent pool. And rules that hinder rather than help the game.

Even in Canada, where the love of the sport is so intrinsically linked to our culture, the importance of the lockout is fading. We’ve survived the fall and winter without our beloved Saturday Hockey Night in Canada. For many of us, the game of hockey lives on at our local rinks, junior levels and amateur levels.

Whatever the outcome, the result will change the NHL forever. The game might improve or it might not.

back to top

 

       


Home  | Feature | Sports  | Entertainment | Technology  | The Write Corner | Submissions | About Us Advertise
copyright 2005 expressionmag.com  All rights reserved.